Teleworking has been on the increase in recent years. Do you think this is a negative or postive development ?
_____________________________________________
Working from home is the most adaptable method of most modern-day societies. While the pandemic is worldwide spreading, more and more people prefer home-based work. From my perspective, I somewhat think that teleworking is a positive development for workers and a negative one for companies.
On the one hand, working from home is a suitable way of maintaining a career for workers. A work-at-home job can boost productivity due to the embracement of flexibility. Workers can seize a unique opportunity to balance the professional and family life by having spare time for other activities around the house and in turn maintain the staff’s high level of happiness. In addition, as people all work from home, it will create a saving on the travel costs. It’s better for them to take all the time that they consume on the way commuting to work, to complete the other task from their company. It does not only decrease travel costs but also increases infrastructure costs and creates a less-contaminated world.
However, work-based at home somehow gets into difficulties for companies. When the staff had their eyes glued to the screen to undertake the task online, they may feel less identified with the company. Because they will experience a feeling of left-out by their teammates, making it increasingly challenging for them to meet the business goals. Furthermore, this way of working will create trouble with the oversight process. The boss cannot directly check the rating process of an important project because they do not have any ideas about if their staff are working or not. As a result, the headmasters, for example, are unable to troubleshoot common problems instantly.
In conclusion, I believe that teleworking could assist workers in improving their productivity and saving travel costs. However, due to the prevalence, home-based working is becoming less effective as companies will tackle some of the threats.
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 80
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most society How does this quality affect each individual and is it a positive or negative trend 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 223, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...less effective as companies will tackle some of the threats.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...panies will tackle some of the threats.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37942122186 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.74007425162 2.80592935109 133% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591639871383 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6615973603 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4117647059 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0651988930686 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219346081849 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415088911459 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0361684741305 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329704785984 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.