It has been recognized that only by tightening controls on careless drivers will road safety be upgraded. While I accept that this may be an efficient resolution, I believe that substantial improvements can also be reaped by other feasible measures.
On the one hand, imposing more rigorous punishments is predicted to reduce the risk on roads. To be more specific, adopting these policies, the government is expected to substantially raise public awareness about the importance of abiding by road safety regulations. Indeed, if driving offenders are informed that illegal manipulation on the roads may result in a higher on-the-spot fine or even imprisonment, they will find it necessary to avoid perpetuating careless driving due to the serious consequence they have to suffer. As a result, citizens will be less likely to suffer from catastrophic accidents. For example, when the UK government introduced an official ban on driving while intoxicated, statistics showed a significant decline in the number of head-on collisions, or hit-and-run due to drinking driving, proving the effectiveness of this announcement.
On the other hand, I concur with the view that there are also several other ways that can be proposed to gain road safety. Firstly, conducting vehicle inspections should be highly recommended for drivers. Indeed, if this project is applied on a regular basis, they will help the authorities eliminate transportations which are not roadworthy enough and, therefore, diminish accidents caused by their wear and tears. Secondly, upgrading and expanding public transport provision is another suitable solution. To be more specific, when state-owned railway and bus systems become ubiquitous and speed up journey times, they are believed to discourage the use of private vehicles, which prevents citizens from pile-up due to driving by themselves.
In brief, while not disavowing positive effects of stricter punishments, I believe that other road safety measures can bring about similar outcomes.
- This table shows the percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 90
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 76
- Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth However some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
- Many people think studying in university is a waste of time and money. They are supposed that young people should work for real experience. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sures can bring about similar outcomes.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in brief, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09313872436 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6178570956 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113551496648 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392270602139 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366395405011 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757101284944 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226453249436 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.