In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

One- person household is becoming increasingly fashionable today. People have sparked off a heated controversy over whether it is good or bad. In my opinion, this trend exerts a double- edged impact on the society, which I will discuss below.

Regarding the advantages, it is acceptable that one- person household benefits not only individuals but also the economy. Indeed, people living alone need to equip themselves with many essential skills, such as cooking, washing clothes or managing their budget. As a result, without assistances of their flatmates or relatives, a person is more likely to be independent and self- reliant. On the other hand, from an economic perspective, the rising number of household is a powerful motivation for development, thanks to it urgent demand on real estate and utilities. This is also the reason explaining a period of growing prosperity for many industries, like construction or real estate.

However, the influences of one- person households can be considered from the opposite angle. To be more specific, the trend towards living alone is jeopardy with person who suffers from health problems like cardiovascular diseases, epilepsy or asthma, etc., which may lead to lack of self- control in several emergency situations, and, in addition, a serious consequence as they are not supported by others. Turning to economical aspect, the growing number of people willing to live alone creates a great demand on accommodation that the infrastructure may find challenging to satisfy, as we see in many metropolitans, for example, London, Tokyo or Rio de Janeiro. As a result, the living cost will gain so highly that people may be unable to afford.

To sum up, the trend towards living alone is beneficial for the society thanks to offering worth of skills and motivation for thriving. In contrast, its negative effect should not be overlooked. Living alone is still reccommended, provided that people have enough skills and potential.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-18 qqwqe 78 view
2019-08-15 everjoe4life 73 view
2019-08-07 Jerry Turtle 78 view
2019-07-16 sawera15 11 view
2019-06-27 Tri H. Ho 67 view
Essays by user phuong cao :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e society, which I will discuss below. Regarding the advantages, it is accepta...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies, like construction or real estate. However, the influences of one- person ...
^^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'satisfying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: satisfying
...the infrastructure may find challenging to satisfy, as we see in many metropolitans, for e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y that people may be unable to afford. To sum up, the trend towards living alon...
^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople have enough skills and potential.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, still, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29523809524 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95961564514 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6502893091 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160168937294 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514024939497 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415540299276 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953987700625 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304389866659 0.056905535591 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.