Open plan office no walls, no barriers. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Constructing plan office has recently been a trendy option among companies. Both pros and cons can be seen in this development and personally, I believe its benefits can totally outshadow its drawbacks
On the one hand, working in the same room with loads of people may discomfort many individuals as it invades one’s privacy and concentration. Having to work in a plan office can be really uncomfortable and inconvenient as any acitivity people do can be noticed by numerous other colleagues. Therefore, it potentially creates a sense of confinement rather than a workplace since people can not do anything but work. Moreover, it can be a nuisance when there are too many noises coming from various people at the same time, which can be immensely disruptive, thus, deteriorating the productivity
On the other hand, a plan office can do wonders to not only employers but also their employees as it helps promote communication and save more money and time to be constructed. Specifically, this type of office by nature brings a host of opportunities for people to get to know more of their co-workers since there is no limit and more people in a room, hence, in a long term generate solidarity and friendliness in their own offices. In addition, it takes entrepreneurs a considerably smaller amount of money to erect plan office compared to the traditional one because fewer walls are needed as there are not many rooms and more time can be saved when the distances between different company parts are shorter
To conclude, plan offices have drawn in many attention from companies because of their unique style. Although it can take its toll on the employees regarding their privacy and concentration, the positivity can outweigh the negativity because of its friendliness, affordability and time-saving
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 11
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled Overall the recycling of 61
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 78
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun attention seems to be countable; consider using: 'many attentions'.
Suggestion: many attentions
...To conclude, plan offices have drawn in many attention from companies because of their unique ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09764309764 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08112268637 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.229826861 49.4020404114 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.25 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.125 20.7667163134 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.375 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133816625774 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639498060245 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361898536211 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798810414759 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361099258333 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.0946893788 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.46 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun attention seems to be countable; consider using: 'many attentions'.
Suggestion: many attentions
...To conclude, plan offices have drawn in many attention from companies because of their unique ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09764309764 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08112268637 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.229826861 49.4020404114 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.25 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.125 20.7667163134 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.375 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133816625774 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639498060245 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361898536211 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798810414759 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361099258333 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.0946893788 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.46 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.