In order to solve traffic problem, governments should tax private car owner heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.what are advantages and disadvantages of such solution?

Essay topics:

In order to solve traffic problem, governments should tax private car owner heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
what are advantages and disadvantages of such solution?

Traffic handling have become prominent issue in several cities. To mollify these issue, one of the solution is charging high taxes on
private cars and use that money in improvising public transportation facilities. This essay will highlight that this is certainly
advantageous despite a few inevitable drawbacks.

Increasing taxes on private cars will certainly mitigate the usage to personal vehicles. Firstly, this would result in pollution
reduction which helps in creating balanced environment. An additional point is, middle classed categorized people will think twice
before using their own vehicles and will opt to use public transportation. As per statistics of Washington Post, approximately
3 billion people belong to middle class. Hence, there can be much advancement in usage of public transport and elevate government
budgets for public transportation.

However, it might be more disadvantageous for the people whose solely way of income is gained by occupation of driving. Majority of
the drivers will face difficulty in paying these high tax. As, their annual income drops down, their survival becomes complex. Apart
from it, raising the taxes on private cars could affect the company of the car, because individuals would refrain from buying budget
cars. If these policy needs to be implemented then one of the solution is to raise taxes but to a certain limit. This might be more
efficient solution and an equilibrium is created in public and government by introducing these scheme.

To sum up, charging high taxes would not be good option but, as mentioned that charging taxes to thin and static value can help to
both government and people.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-31 shiv_mark42 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... public transport and elevate government budgets for public transportation. Ho...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, then, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42965779468 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86400897065 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6973759284 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 15.0 4.38176352705 342% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231144539441 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707785903493 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612039973697 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775379203865 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431786530223 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.