Over the last few decades, the media has promoted the image of young thin women as being ideal. What problems has this caused? What solutions can you suggest for this issue
In this contemporary era, slim women have been portrayed as the first option for the standard of beauty perfection. There are some primary outcomes and feasible solutions which I will elucidate in the forthcoming paragraphs.
The utmost adverse effect from the new normalization of standardized woman image in public might form the beauty standard objectification in the entertainment industries which crave bright and ideal skin body types to be their icons. In other words, those young women might feel unconfident with their own body shape; hence the more they undergo insecurity, the more they might become addicted to body sculpting surgery, such as botox and filler, in the earlier age. Furthermore, most celebrities are highly competing to uphold their fame with only their physical appearance. Evidently, a number of beauty influencers often promote amazing results of their healthy looks while concealing the complexities or challenges behind the process which contradicts reality.
Turning to the viable solutions of this issue is coming from beauty brands which should be friendly for all people regardless of skin colour and body shapes differences. It. Is crucial to know the fact that the involvement of these companies attracts public perspective on what true beauty looks like. Take Victoria Secret as an example, well-known American incorporation has released underwear products with plus-size to support egalitarian society. Moreover, declaring the importance of inner beauty has a tendency to create an individual’s mental awareness. Being discriminated against for appearance is one of prevailing stress issues among adolescents in which body dissatisfaction is supposed to be eliminated from one’s perception.
In summary, two main impacts of dominating ideal youngsters in numerous media are related to the competition of public figures and the unacceptable beauty standard in society. Nonetheless, the remedies of this are creating friendly advertisements for any shape of people’s body and influencing them to perceive good mental habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | Jakhongir Rasulov | 79 | view |
- More and more people want to own items such as cars clothing and other things that are made by famous brands Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development because this land would be better used for h 95
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 73
- Today the expensive price of popular consumer products is because of the power of advertising and not real needs of people Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some believe that giving final assistance can increase the poverty rate while others think this is one of ways to reduce it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...y outcomes and feasible solutions which I will elucidate in the forthcoming parag...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, while, in summary, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68167202572 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08579498096 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646302250804 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8264942507 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.923076923 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158137793476 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505496078997 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422447745824 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949818735029 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277417927214 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.