Parents should force their children for sports instead of studying Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Parents should force their children for sports, instead of studying. Do you agree or disagree?

In millennium days, it is believed by some that, the guardian should motivate their children to involve more in physical or sports activity, rather than hard academic studies. If asked, I certainly agree with the given statement, and the reasons for my stand will be analyzed further.

There are several benefits of the activities. Firstly, children able to deliver optimum performance. What I mean to say by this is that, sports make kids physically feet, and it is proven that a healthy mind resides in a healthy body, and we all know that healthy mind absorb more information than unhealthy one. According to research, in the USA, it concludes that children, who are playing sports, perform better in the classroom than their counterparts

Furthermore, outdoor games help children's to build some skills. By this I mean, it is noticed that leadership skills and team spirit skills are increased in them, when they are playing sports, like football, cricket and many more. Also, they enable themselves to accept the failure with pride, which would be beneficial to them in the future. For instance, according to one survey in India, kids with leadership skill have a high chance to get success in the future.

On the other hand, academic education is also important. In other words, these days, it is very difficult to get a job, without a certain level of education. For example, if a child want to become doctor, then at least he has to complete MBBS degree. In Japan, 23% of youngsters are unemployed, because of one piece of paper, called degree.

In conclusion, I reiterate that, sports or physical activities are essential for child, as it will help to build up the performance, and learn different skills as well, like leadership and team spirit skills, however the education has a same importance as sports, as it would be beneficial to get a high paid job in the future.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-17 Kha Linh 61 view
2024-12-17 Kha Linh 61 view
2024-12-14 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
2024-12-13 Sang Sang Sang 78 view
2024-12-08 ankushgurumaa 78 view
Essays by user ketul :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, as to, at least, for example, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.915625 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67115487372 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7265764269 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.357142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124809463571 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379029109773 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428539878384 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709989342899 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538952961561 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.