In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In the past, various knowledge was stored in books. Nowadays, technology developed so, instead of books we can find more quick and easy many knowledge on the Internet. In my opinion, there are more benefits than disadvantages, so I think that the data stored on the internet can offer extensive benefits for everyone.
On the one hand, the main advantage of the Internet as a major medium of knowledge from various perspectives. Firstly, we quickly find the knowledge on the Internet more than in books, in other words, we do not spend a long time discovering the information. Moreover, the source of knowledge on the Internet is easily accessible from any location and time. Anyone with access to the Internet can quickly access knowledge without geographical constraints. And we get highly secure and keep our information safe online. Furthermore, online information can be shared faster through the link. It is safe and convenient.
On the one hand, The disadvantages of online data storing are numerous. Internet data have much fake information, unlike the only right knowledge books. Therefore, we can use the wrong knowledge for assignments, and reports. Moreover, we are at the cost of buying digital devices to access the Internet. Most digital devices are an expensive option for some whereas books are a cheaper option to get the same knowledge. And some people said that books are still safer than online because the Internet has many viruses.
in conclusion, I believe that the advantages outweigh the drawbacks and that the information kept online may be significantly beneficial for everyone.
- The two graphs compares that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 73
- The two graphs compare that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- The graph below describe number of arrest per year for using illegal drugs between 1991 and 2005 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...f books we can find more quick and easy many knowledge on the Internet. In my opinio...
^^^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much knowledge', 'a good deal of knowledge'.
Suggestion: much knowledge; a good deal of knowledge
...f books we can find more quick and easy many knowledge on the Internet. In my opinion, there a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...cause the Internet has many viruses. in conclusion, I believe that the advantag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, whereas, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20689655172 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89831992088 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0362111261 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9411764706 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3529411765 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311963263954 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934206210593 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692916793609 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169800406747 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691115556203 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.