People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world?
People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world?
Although humans’ living standards tend to increase day by day, there are still many people who have no good understanding of the significance of the natural environment. While some culprits have to be responsible for this problem, I believe that we completely mitigate it in some ways.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why some people have a limited amount of knowledge related to natural world. First of all, many people have not faced environmental issues in reality in some certain areas yet. Some locations possess favourable environmental conditions which are suitable for human beings, and therefore, they cannot be aware of natural disasters and habitat degradations and so on. Furthermore, from the political perspective, some countries nowadays are so concerned about improving economic sectors that they cannot take environmental problems into consideration. India is a typical example as authorities of this developing country always make an effort to reach economic achievements, and therefore, they want to raise public’s awareness about economic aspects instead of fighting against climate change or global warming.
On the other hand, this problem can be alleviated by some interventions. Firstly, the significance of international collaborations are instrumental in raising politicians’ awareness about preserving the natural world in undeveloped and developing nations, which should be led by some global organisations such as the UN. Secondly, national and local governments should impose more supportive policies and provide more subsidies to encourage education systems to instruct their citizens about the importance of environment. For instance, apart from delivering relating lectures in the class, some extra-curricular activities such as re-greening denuded areas should be implemented by schools to broaden students’ horizons about nature and form consciousness about environmentally-friendly relationships among children.
In conclusion, while some people nowadays still understand carelessly about the importance of the natural world, there are many remedies which help people to learn more about living in harmony with our planet.
- The plan below shows a typical American and Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80813953488 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30925819971 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575581395349 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.062059684 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.714285714 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467255263995 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20855743793 0.084324248473 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.231328199095 0.0667982634062 346% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380109091573 0.151304729494 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.318858900453 0.056905535591 560% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.