Most people are no interested in how their food has been produced. They only care about how much it it costs. How true is this statement? What influences people when they buy food? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is apparent that most customers merely are aware of whether their foods are affordable or not rather than how they are produced. I would argue that it is hard for people to consciously recognise this problem while buying foodstuff, and therefore, it probably leads to some significant influences on purchasers.
It is undeniable that modern citizens are following a fast-pace lifestyle which they have to encounter many deterrents to make ends meet, consequently, people usually prioritize good’s prices during their making-decision, which make them easily ignore other crucial issues such as how they are produced or how much their carbon footprint is. For example, customers prefer allocating their budget on imported foods from Chinese companies because they usually have no difficulties to gain good bargains compared with other manufacturers. From another perspective, we have to accept that it is not easy to have a complete understanding of food production even if customers have a thirst for reliable information about their products. Milk is a typical example of this situation when most people do not know how they are produced. While using milk derived from other animals such as goats or cows is still a well-known topic of controversy, this product is usually broadcast propaganda like a perfect source of protein and nutrition for humans in every corner of the world.
In terms of the impacts of this phenomenon, I believe that this problem is the primary culprit for some negative overcomes. Firstly, people probably are swayed by unreasonable cheap prices of foods and buy them impulsively without launching a full-scale investigation about the products and no matter if they are safe or not. Some companies are found guilty for illegally adding melamine to milk during the milk process aiming to reduce products’ prices for example. Secondly, while environmental degradation is always high on the agenda of authorities, some factories gained a competitive edge relating to price by operating old technologies while processing foods such as discharging directly their chemical waste or by-products into the river or ground to reduce the cost of manufacturing. It is clear that governments should impose many stricter regulations on such companies, though their customers can reach affordable foods.
To sum up, while I agree that there are some reasons why people nowadays fall into the habit of concerning how much they have to spend on their food rather than producing processes, I believe that it brings people to some considerable drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-02 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 62
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 67
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 78
- The graphs below shows the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 who participated in organized cultural activities and sports in 2003 in Australia Summarise the informtion by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32432432432 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95927357205 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562653562654 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8872031203 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.692307692 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3076923077 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323308107247 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118556794097 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787080016652 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210092426168 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501429130374 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.