People in many countries are spending less time with their family. What are the reasons for this? What problems does this cause?
In this day and age, people are devoting a smaller fraction of their time to their family. In this essay, I will discuss several reasons for this trend and examine its consequences.
Various factors contribute to the weakened value of family time, one of which is because more and more people are prioritizing work and school over family. The economic strike of the COVID-19 pandemic, together with a significant increase in society’s expectations and peer pressure have forced many people to spend more time in their office. In fact, it has been reported that 46% of people in the United States put their careers and success above their families. In addition, the boom in entertainment choices also weakens the value of family time for many people. Today, people can opt for a multitude of interesting activities such as traveling and gaming to spend their holidays or to simply relax after stressful hours. As a result, they may get engrossed in entertainment and forget family duties.
This situation will consequently have adverse outcomes on society. First of all, it will weaken the bond between family members and exacerbate the generational gap. Without frequent communication, family members may not be able to catch up on each other’s lives, failing to understand and sympathize with one another. Moreover, increased stress and loneliness may result from a lack of family bonding time, especially for people who have to live far away from home. In recent years, many cases of students having depression and anxiety after studying abroad have been reported. Therefore, it is undeniable that spending less time with family has a profound impact on people’s overall mental health and well-being.
In conclusion, different priorities is one of the main reasons for the lack of family time in modern society. It is a worrying problem that can greatly impact the bond between family members, as well as their mental health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-04 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries Why do young people choose to do so Who will benefit more young people or the communities 73
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13607594937 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72187773614 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6797313904 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360872921939 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11203076568 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614086648464 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224634813434 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512157316761 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.