People nowadays spend their free time less actively than in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
Human lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over couple of decades. Presently, folks are more inactive than they used to be. Here, I would like to Accord with the given statement firmly.
A bunch of points can be mentioned to support my point of view. First and foremost, development in technology is the predominant factor which contribute to sedentary lifestyle. To make it clear, unlike past, in parallel to advancement in technology and hiking popularity of electronic apparatus such as computers and smartphone the use of these gizmos for playing digital games, watching movies and listening music has increased significantly. Consequently, people have a propensity to devote time on digital devices instead of actively participating in outdoor activities. Moreover, nowaday, civilians use various social sites like WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook to communicate with the others instead of commuting from place to another in order to meet them. On the other side, these sites were not available in the past time and people spend their time activity by doing traveling in order to meet kith and kins. Needless to say, people nowadays and consume free time less activities than past.
Probing ahead, hectic schedule is another factor which contributes to sedentary lifestyle. To demonstrate, in this contemporary epoch, people are under the work pressure as they are involved in working sector in order to earn their bread and butter. Therefore, they give preference to do relax rather than spending their time by actively playing football, cricket and so on. It is apparently seen that people are more inactive today as they have invlination towards indoor activities.
To recapitulate, taking into consideration above reasons, I strongly believe that folks this contemporary world are living less active life than a former time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Failure is the proof that desire was not strong enough To what extend do you agree with this statement give reasons for your answer 73
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car on motorbike to what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problem To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement what other measures and do you think might be effective 84
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food Others however think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In countries like Japan the population is getting older are the effects of aging population on society is a negative or positive Discuss both views and give your opinion 51
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
..., these sites were not available in the past time and people spend their time activity by...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 974, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun activities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
..., people nowadays and consume free time less activities than past. Probing ahead,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41319444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86819637467 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4156014935 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.933333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338185366778 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101190176651 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136742533995 0.0667982634062 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164805151061 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100699391214 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
..., these sites were not available in the past time and people spend their time activity by...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 974, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun activities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
..., people nowadays and consume free time less activities than past. Probing ahead,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41319444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86819637467 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4156014935 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.933333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338185366778 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101190176651 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136742533995 0.0667982634062 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164805151061 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100699391214 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.