People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
People believe that governmental bodies should increase the price of petrol to mitigate the growing number of environmental problems. However, I strongly disagree with this point of view, as doing so would make little change to the lives of the wealthy families and cause negative problems to the middle-class. Instead, it is advisable that the governments attempt to find more environmentally friendly alternatives.
Raising the cost of fuel cannot solve environmental problems because millions of rich people will continue to use these kinds of resources. For them, the cost might not really be a significant matter as they want to make their lives as comfortable as possible without taking the natural environment into consideration. However, making fossil fuels more expensive will directly affect the living standard of the middle-class and lower-income households. Travelling plays a crucial role in these people’s daily routines so that if they are forced to spend more on fuels, they will have to minimize other basic needs. As a result, pollution would continue regardless of the higher price of fossil fuels and the gap between the rich and poor widened.
Nevertheless, the governments all around the world can seek for other excellent methods to deal with environmental pollution. They can invest more time and money on scientists and engineers working to create other renewable energy. For instance, Tesla has successfully launched many cars that are powered by electricity, which does not do any harm to the environment. Besides, there are a wide range of renewable resources that the governments can tap on to make improvements to the environment, be it wind, tide, or nuclear energy.
In conclusion, I disagree that increasing the price of fuels can improve the quality of the environment, even if it has a severe impact on lower-income families, which leads to a larger gap between classes in the society. Instead, what they can concentrate on to resolve the environment problems is promoting the community to create and use more sustainable energy resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 61
- Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 11
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 67
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32424242424 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05785204626 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572727272727 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1500499204 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249984564599 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809682972718 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055095696418 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137304963355 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306087659764 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.