People who decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who often change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often debated that people who choose a career path early in life and stick with it are more likely to have a fulfilling working life than those who change jobs frequently. From my perspective, while job hopping has its own benefits, I firmly agree that people should choose a job earlier on and in this essay, I will support my opinion with relevant examples.
On the one hand, there is a wide range of benefits to job-hopping. To begin with, people who change their jobs have the opportunity to try their hands in different fields and thereby acquire more skills. They may find job satisfaction in being able to put the knowledge gained from previous employment into practice at the new workplace. What’s more, job hoppers who experience various working environments have the chance to find what suits them best. What I mean is that these kinds of experiences give them the feeling of challenge and excitement.
On the other hand, there are strong reasons why we should have a permanent career early. Firstly, if people stay in a job long term, they will have the opportunity to be considered for promotion and salary increase. That is to say, those who work longer for a company stand a higher chance of moving up the ladder and earn a more lucrative living. Secondly, people will focus their time and energy on those that can help them pursue their targets. For instance, those who dream to be doctors should learn some subjects deeply such as math, physics, chemistry, and biology. Others who decide to become doctors after graduation, in comparison, will be unable to do so since they will need to complete more than eight years of professional training in universities.
In conclusion, I believe that despite the excitement that changing jobs brings, it is staying with the same job that is more likely to bring greater job fulfillment.
- Some people think th t the detailed description of crimes on newspapers and TV had bad consequence so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays some parents put a lot of pressure on their children Why is the reason for doing that Is this a positive or negative development for the children 73
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 61
- What are the causes and solutions to obesity 11
- With the fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59632295303 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583072100313 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2077339805 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.785714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416727220917 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133115741504 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125816283912 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241486459787 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083506163455 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.