A person´s worth, for me, is a very important element that tells you a lot about the person. The problem is that everyone can measure that worth with different standards. Even though nowadays it seems to be more important to have a social status and possessions, I still think that values like honor and trust are the valid ones to judge someone's worth.
Firstly, I think that trust is the most important indicator of someone´s worth. Trust is a very complex value, because it is earned and you have to keep being trustworthy all the time to be a person everyone can trust. For me, someone that breaks your trust in a deep way cross automatically to the “no worth” list. I believe that if someone that betrays me, is not worth my trust.
Secondly, I think honor is also an important value to judge someone´s worth. An honorable person is someone that does the correct thing every time, even though it is not beneficial for themselves. I can think in the actual Pope, Francisco. I believe he is the most honorable person I know, and he is the living example of someone that does what is needed to be done and what it has to be done, even if it is not the best for him. For example, compared to other Popes he does not wear fancy clothes and jewelry, he walks as a normal person by the street and is always preaching with the example.
As a conclusion, I think that the new ways of judging someone's value in today’s society are not correct. I truly believe that old-fashioned values like trust and honor are the ones that indicate a person’s worth.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
- It is important to lean the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.to what extend do you agree and disagree with this opinion?what sort of punishment should parents and teachers be a 67
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which you consider to be the most effective.-comics-books-radio-television-film-theatre 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a deep way" with adverb for "deep"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... For me, someone that breaks your trust in a deep way cross automatically to the 'no wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...iving example of someone that does what is needed to be done and what it has to be...
^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d is always preaching with the example. As a conclusion, I think that the new wa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, as to, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60211267606 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69453175684 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471830985915 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9237037817 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3571428571 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238928596107 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920557507837 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571993996787 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1689064123 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600619040746 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.