A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons

To judge somebody in today's world, is he/she rich or poor is quite general. In my opinion I totally agree with this notion that people vanished there old-values and lifestyle.
We are living in world were artificial thing place a primarily role in human activities. Surrounded by gadgets, clothes, lifestyle, western culture, social status, material possessions etc, are given priorities. For example
In earlier India were people are not so found of judging each other. Focused on their work, old-fashioned values, honor, kind and give respect to one another. They wear different clothes,but have a beautiful mind and heart to acknowledge them. they don't cheat there family, spouse, friends, for there personal benefits.
However in today's world everything is so modernize and western that people have different mind set of social status and material possession. They have less values and humor. For example, family in India are more concentrate on socializing everything through social media, clothes, high status, car, house then on moral values. Many of the people turn back on there friends, cheat there spouse, bully there colleague. And if today's parents are so unaware of there responsibilities then there children will be miles away from human values. But still some of the families are there who give there child good education, old-custom values, principles etc.
In conclusion, I believe the notion is true and we should not let our generation ruin our ethics. Whereas some people still follow there customs and human values.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('primarily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('role') instead of another adjective.
...ng in world were artificial thing place a primarily role in human activities. Surrounded by gadg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...iorities. For example In earlier India were people are not so found of judging each...
^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...one another. They wear different clothes,but have a beautiful mind and heart to ackn...
^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ful mind and heart to acknowledge them. they dont cheat there family, spouse, friend...
^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ind and heart to acknowledge them. they dont cheat there family, spouse, friends, fo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... friends, for there personal benefits. However in todays world everything is so modern...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun values is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...atus and material possession. They have less values and humor. For example, family i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 548, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...miles away from human values. But still some of the families are there who give there child...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29387755102 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63204865709 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636734693878 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6191997399 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.0625 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3125 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157467525588 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466151028906 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045842352121 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080391291724 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390229107977 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.