Phones at school
Nowadays, in order to make the lectures easier for students to understand and absorb the knowledge, some institutions permit their pupils to utilize smart devices. From my point of view, smartphones can be helpful or detrimental depending on the way students use them. And this essay will discuss the reasons for my view as follow.
Smartphones indeed assist us in numerous approaches. First and foremost, it helps the students gain knowledge from lessons more comfortably. Searching for study materials on their own by smartphones can stimulate their ability to search for information, analysis skills and makes them more active during the periods. In History class, which is considered to be boring, students can look up information with the assistance of their cellphones, then discuss with their peers the questions asked by the teachers. As a result, they attain a deeper understanding of the lessons and find more interest in this subject. Secondly, students can take notes easily when cellular phones are allowed at school. Some students may be slow in taking notes from the board or projector they can use their in-camera phone feature to take a picture of the notes, they did not catch, so as not to miss anything.
However, smartphones could bring about negative effects on students. One of the reasons why some schools are still afraid to let electronic devices become prevalent in classes is that they can be a distraction to students. Overusing smartphones can lead to students’ poorer academic performance. Students can easily turn to social media such as Facebook or Instagram when they feel like there is no need to listen to their lecturers and surfing on these social platforms is much more fascinating. Another disadvantage of using smartphones in classrooms is that the cost of these devices can lead to an unequal learning experience for students. Students from low-income families may not have access to mobile phones and miss out on the interactive activities that teachers incorporate into lessons. They either need to share another student's phone or get access to a phone through the school to reap the benefits. Consequently, it may affect the quality of the discussions among students since it takes them more time to find out information to be able to solve the problems given by the teachers.
In sum, bringing electronic devices into educational programs can be both beneficial and harmful. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance that teachers and parents should keep an eye on their children and give instruction on how to use a cell phone effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-06 | khanhlinhlenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-22 | soomi2209 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-08 | Usman Khan | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | mohd shaiq | 89 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | datprono28 | 73 | view |
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The advantages and disavantages of online learning 73
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 47
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Topic The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ay will discuss the reasons for my view as follow. Smartphones indeed assist us in num...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15602836879 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84449332864 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550827423168 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6708506322 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.05 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141208361047 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479583542217 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101013474656 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076012960425 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510634294523 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.