The pie chart
The pie chart shows four reasons why farmland significantly decreased in the world today. In general, deforestation and over- gzazing hold 65% in whole. Over- cultivation stood 28%. And the other reasons account for only 7%.
And the four reasons affected three countries of the world during the 1990s, namely, North America, Europe and Oceania. With deforestation, Europe stood at 9.8% whereas the impact of North America and Oceania was minimal with 0.2% and 1.7% respectively. Move on to over- cultivation, Europe continued to lead to 7.7%. By constract, Oceania hit a low with 0% and North America with 3.3%. Oceania, total land degraded with 13% and suffered from 11.3% of over- grazing- the highest percentage of 3 countries. While the others suffered 1.5% and 5.5% respectively. Moreover, total land degraded of Europe hit a high with 23%, so they bore the biggest damage. However, North America suffered the lowest losses with 5% in 3 regions.
Conclusion, it is precise that Europe stood more farmland than the other countries in the world. And that loss came from deforestation and over-cultivation .
- the pie chart 41
- The pie chart 56
- the three pie chart
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D
- teach children 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie chart shows four reasons why farmland signific...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... from deforestation and over-cultivation .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21111111111 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83045527453 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 176.041082164 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 506.74238477 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7283620505 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.0 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8571428571 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0585834210744 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227141186904 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818969196153 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612241374739 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865840055602 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 50.2224549098 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.05 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.