The practice of illegally hunting wild animals continues to cause concern in many countries, particularly developing countries.
What are the causes of such hunting?
What are the effects on the animals and on the wider human society in these countries and beyond?
Poaching is a practice that has raised concerns in multiple nations across the globe, especially in ones that are still developing. This practice has 2 principle causes and an impact that is felt on many levels, which will be elucidated in the following essay.
Discussing the reasons for illegal hunting, the most alluring is the sizeable profit gained from selling desired body parts of animals to unscrupulous traders and collectors. For instance, ivories, shark fins and rhino horns are highly sought-after and charged exorbitant prices because of either their novelty and rarity values or imaginary medicinal properties. Another factor that sustains the practice of poaching is the pressure of hunting for food, which forces local people to hunt purely for meat. Exemplified by some countries in South Africa, the roots of this tend to be in famine, drought or regional political instability as these can disrupt food supply,
If left unchecked, there are dire consequences to poaching. Most immediately, the animals that are prime targets for illegal hunters may be endangered or even go extinct. This could be exemplified by the fact that certain breeds of tigers and elephants are now kept in conservative enclosures due to their dwindling numbers while less fortunate species, such as the Casperian tiger or the Dodo bird, are now permanently eradicated. Loss in biodiversity is often followed by disruptions in food chains, which eventually takes a toll on human lives. The absence of predators like tigers may trigger a population boom in agricultural pests such as deer and rabbits, which lower agricultural yields by feeding on or destroying crops. As many species disappear, there starts the erosion of a country’s cultural heritage, including its animals, landscapes and natural resources. Case in point, it is hard to imagine what Australia would be without kangaroos and China without pandas.
In brief, poaching stems from 2 main reasons: monetary gains and survival pressure in certain areas. Without proper controlling measures, it is bound to worsen biodiversity loss, food chain disruption and cultural erosion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-31 | scorpiothienhat | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-01 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 89
- Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals while others think that it is important to protect some not all of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bility as these can disrupt food supply, If left unchecked, there are dire conse...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chain disruption and cultural erosion.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, while, for instance, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38988095238 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84220892496 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645833333333 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4549375685 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.357142857 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163113453411 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447092442188 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347292792653 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790098747969 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04623130779 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.