Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Opinions are divided on whether information in science, business and the academic world should be shared to the fullest extent, or if the protection of vital data is still needed. This essay aims to shed light on both perspectives and show my support for the latter.
Sharing information as much as possible is argued to beneficial. The salient argument here is that this approach will enhance collaboration, which engenders various types of development. For example, if customer data collected by Google are shared with other companies, the companies can improve their products and services. Likewise, while scientists utilizing updates results from their contemporaries’ work can timely adjust their procedures, design new projects or at least, avoid unnecessary repetitions, academic institutions can elevate their training quality using shared resources, which lead to more qualified graduates. However, this approach seems to require cooperation on a large scale, of which likelihood is rather low since humans tend to be competitive and strive to protect their advantages.
On the other hand, I contend that restricting access to vital information is more justifiable for several reasons. Forefront among which is the fact that all individuals and organizations have the right to fully benefit from the result of their hard work. It would be unfair, for instance, to force companies to exchange their findings, which might take years to produce, with their rivals if adequate returns were not guaranteed. In fact, most organizations employ various measures to protect crucial data, such as customer database, cutting-edge business strategies and unique organizational protocols, to ensure their survival and growth. If such secrets were obtained by their competitors, organizations could lose their business advantages, which could jeopardize their operation.
To conclude, I agree that information of great importance and value should be protected. There are indeed merits to the idea of sharing information; however, this practice is unlikely feasible and may do more harm than good.
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 92
- In many countries truancy skipping classes is a worrying problem for both parents and educators What are the causes of truancy What may be the effects on the child and the wider community 89
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 67
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 89
- Intelligence is the most important quality of a leader To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easible and may do more harm than good.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, may, so, still, while, at least, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6403785489 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01955532764 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634069400631 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8492106305 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144184980841 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642482687987 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731525295094 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106677493805 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422074801203 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.