At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
A wide range of population gap between younger and older people is noted in some nations. Proportion of young adults is significantly high compared to the older population. Although it is serving the country as a whole by providing more earning hands, job opportunities are decreasing due to more people competing for a particular post. Thus it has less benefits compared to the disadvantages.
To embark upon, younger the population, more will be the enthusiasm and energy among them towards work. Adults are more capable of performing ultra-challenging tasks required by the demanding jobs which in turn hike the country’s literacy and employment rates. As an example, China with more younger population have more manpower that is why it is termed as developed country on a global scale. Thus, youth has an imperative role towards globalisation which is the greatest benefit.
On the flip side, while it has colossal advantages linked to it people are finding difficulties in getting jobs. They are rendered jobless which paradoxically has negative impact on the nation’s economy. To illustrate, recent study in India has shown that due to increasing population employment opportunities are dwindling. Adults are becoming more prone to depression and other stress related illnesses due to less availability of work.
To reciprocate, the proportion of older people compared to younger population is far less. Despite more young blood is available to surge the economy of a country, people are struggling to find jobs due to this. In my opinion, it is the hardship which is ultimately making this situation more disadvantageous than advantageous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | venkatesh1018 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | Sushmabenarji | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | JiaYanLi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | JiaYanLi | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is import 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is import 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is import 67
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 56
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is import 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...people competing for a particular post. Thus it has less benefits compared to the di...
^^^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun benefits is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ting for a particular post. Thus it has less benefits compared to the disadvantages....
^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'younger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: younger
...oyment rates. As an example, China with more younger population have more manpower that is w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38314176245 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20340426077 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7043117382 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26666666667 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124089209414 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462095892048 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04865249582 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080385675636 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442832965401 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.