At the present time, the population of some country includes a relatively large number of young adult, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
In many nations around the world, young people represent a large proportion of the population relative to elderly people. This essay will argue that the benefits of a youthful population offset the drawbacks entailed by this state of affairs, as a country with a greater number of young people is better able to grow its economy and care for its elderly citizens.
One commonly cited disadvantage of a young population is that it places a greater strain on public services. This is because larger numbers of young people require more facilities to be built to accommodate them. For example, the government may need to invest more in the school system, which require additional public spending.
Despite this, there are a numbers of significant advantages to having a youthful population. First of all, having more young people creates a bigger market for goods and services. This helps to boost the country’s economy because as young people get older, they purchase essential items such as houses, furniture, and electrical items.
Furthermore, a large youthful demographic also has social benefits, as young people are able to provide care and support to their elderly parents and grandparents. In contrast, countries such as Japan face challenges in looking after their ageing population.
In conclusion, although there are drawbacks to having a youthful population, it is clear that young people can make a significant contribution to their country by developing the economy and providing support to older generations. On balance, I would argue that having a large number of young people is beneficial to any country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-10 | leminhthong098 | 67 | view |
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 89
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or ex 89
- The diagram below shows how rain water is collected and then treated to be used as drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In many large cities people waste hours of their time every day because of traffic congestion on the roads What are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
.... On balance, I would argue that having a large number of young people is beneficial to any count...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26538461538 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84983909024 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8059352395 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.083333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300905244379 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114481919454 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599512616875 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168044314168 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560941349989 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.