The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.
To what extent do you agree?
It's every so often fought that more cash should be spent on protection measures than cures, since they are of higher importance.
There are loads of justifications for why it could be contended that administration ought to put resources into handling the reasons for afflictions. Cost-adequacy is the principal component when putting more importance on those drives. By empowering people to access those wellbeing following methodologies, specialists can keep away from the heavy estimated hospitalized cures or option extremely costly drugs. This way, in addition to the monetary tension on medical services divisions can be diminished, yet additionally the weakening experiencing welcomed on by these irresistible infections. Subsequently, a superior personal satisfaction for individuals who make these strides is a greatly improved decision. Subsequently, if government focuses on deterrent techniques as a fundamental part in handling medical problems, individuals would be having sound existences in a nearby future.In addition, I feel that spending on remedies or medications has of proportionately equivalent significance as of handling triggers. Some diseases are excessively deadly that can’t be left with no intensive, holistic and innovative therapy. As an example, carcinogenic patients could have been recovered with greater rate now, if enormous state budget weren’t invested to generate chemotherapy. Likewise, without sufficient government funds to find the finest possible remedies to patients that are vulnerable, folks’ life expectancy is going to be impacted devastatingly. So these two branches ought to be provided equal cash to keep them moving.
In synopsis, governments need to make wellbeing changes effectively by putting uniformly in the treatment and avoidance of flare-up medical issue in order to improve results from wellbeing denied people as well as guaranteeing a solid and energetic living as they would like to think.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-06-09 | vidung | 95 | view |
2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 73 | view |
- Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days 91
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Many people believe that the increasing use of modern technology at work and in leisure is reducing people s creativity To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is this a positive or negative development 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wellbeing' or ''?
Suggestion: this wellbeing;
... drives. By empowering people to access those wellbeing following methodologies, specialists ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 892, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ing sound existences in a nearby future.In addition, I feel that spending on remed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, well, i feel, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82638888889 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32556966252 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684027777778 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8407986267 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.833333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771008277141 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0262811354977 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319131515906 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594681637922 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211691467932 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.