The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extent do you agree?
It is true governments around the world have been working hard
determining the best budget allocation mix between preventing future
and treating current illnesses. Although millions of ill people need
medical treatments now, governments should still prioritize the
preventive avenue over curative one.
The first reason is that this is a more effective way to spend money
on healthcare. First, by focusing on promoting a healthier lifestyle, the
public will be able to take care of themselves instead of relying on
their governments. For example, by building more parks and sports
facilities, people will have places and tools to improve their own
health by exercising. Second, spending money on preventive
approach ensures that current and future citizens will be able to live
longer and happier than did previous generations. If the preventive
approach was not focused enough, future generations would have
the same or even worse living conditions and lifestyles, which
deteriorates their health.
It is also more efficient to spend money enhancing lifestyle. First, as
dieting and active lifestyles come into play, there would be fewer
needs for medical treatments in the future. Therefore, governments
would in turn save the efforts that could have been put on curing
illnesses. In addition, money would also be saved as there would be
fewer cases requiring medical treatments. The money saved would be
spent on improving the quality of hospitals and clinics, enhancing
public health even more.
In conclusion, it is more effective and efficient in the long run to
focus on preventive approach. This benefits not only the
governments but also the citizens’ health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-09 | vidung | 95 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 73 | view |
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 61
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 61
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 61
- Nowadays most large companies operate multi nationally To what extent those companies should have a responsibility towards local communities in which they operate 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56273764259 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79543457304 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585551330798 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9330824069 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 27.0 4.38176352705 616% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165638028373 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637456118814 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459342243326 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489563501052 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498233031272 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.