Q2. Some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution.
However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, many people think that it would be better for reduce air pollution base on the car-free days, without many ways are more benefit for reducing air pollution. In my point of view, despite other viable option, car-free days would be the best remedy.
It is clear that, if the goverment of the country want to reduce air pollution, they will make many policies relate to the atmosphere. In my opinion, encourage the local in there should be using public transport such as bus and train. There have a lot of ways to encourage are creating more station helping people try more convenient. More over, they could make many polices related to the price of the ticket and promotion for supporting people in moving.In additon, create more penalty for several companies have a limited carbons emissions. For instance, in many companies in European, which is have a limited carbons emissions. They have recieved a heavy fines and other penlaties.
Besides that, The car-free days is the best and effective ways reducing air pollution, these have a lot of benefit. Firstly, banning car will reducing the amount of pollution have in the air, less harmful of gases into atmosphere, creating more conditional for the earth to regenerative. Secondly, if the goverment have car-free days, they will less financial strength use for encourage local using public transport. It is more benefit and convenient to solve both things, decreasing air pollution and encourage people using transportation.
In conclution, although reducing pollution is regulation of particular industry, banning car is play an important role in society and benefit more in other scenarios. In my point of view, in the future the goverment should think to scale up this policy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | duchuynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | duyenlf | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | kelvin sandi | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | ieltsstudent | 95 | view |
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 67
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 61
- These days consumers are faced with an increasing amount of advertising from various companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertising What measures should be taken to protect them 61
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negat development 61
- These days consumers are faced with an increasing amount of advertising from various companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertising What measures should be taken to protect them 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...omotion for supporting people in moving.In additon, create more penalty for severa...
^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...in many companies in European, which is have a limited carbons emissions. They have ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...t of benefit. Firstly, banning car will reducing the amount of pollution have in the air...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15438596491 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69843952489 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8041614524 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283653688922 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104256697888 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759476799576 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187413684152 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661294724926 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.