In recent years, tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit. However, some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is true that more and more tourists have been conscious of cultural and environmental aspects of the countries they visit, although many individuals believe that it is impracticable for those travellers to bear responsibility for these aspects. In my opinion, while I agree that attention has been paid to both culture and environment by tourists themselves, I refute the ladder idea that it is infeasible for them to have responsible manners.
It stands to reason that the large number of holiday-makers have been aware of the cultural and environmental issues of the host nations. To illustrate, in Singapore, a country well-know for the hygiene regulations and street cleanliness to safeguard the environment, visitors often caused frustration because they didnot comform to these strict rules when they pay a visit to this country such as littering the street, notably chewing gums. With the passing of time, they are gradually adopting the norms of this nation and learn how to protect the environment effectively and efficiently. Another prime example is Vietnam, visitors did talk openly about pornographic videos, which are the embarrassing cultural taboo in Vietnamese culture. Nevertheless, it is no longer the case since those visitors are consciously aware and try to avoid mentioning these, especially in public places.
However, I do argue that it is a fallacy to say that tourists cannot be liable for their impacts on the environment and conventions of the countries they flock to. Some proponents of this point of view maintain that those occasional visitors would not follow all the traditions and ways of protecting environment of the locals because of short journey times. But, in my view, it is mainly the matter of consciousness. If, for example, holiday-makers strive to spend one to two days with instructors who excel at conventions and environment practices of the host nations or simply read information about the destinations they will come to in advance, then it is more likely that they could easily adopt all these norms and practices. Consequently, they could feel more confident when roaming around these nations and even receive hospitality from all the locals there.
In conclusion, while I advocate that cultural and environmental awareness are being developed, it is not impossible for all tourist to behave responsibly with the nations they travel to.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Pau Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2017-04-27 | kingnight153 | 49 | view |
- More and more people have pets in their homes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having pets ? 95
- In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this happening? How should they by punished? 84
- Some argue that all young children should be required to stay with full-time education until they are at least 18 years old. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- It is better for colleage students to live in schools than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28795811518 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05227519583 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1128544898 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.384615385 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3846153846 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253730546498 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886903697395 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804765417593 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169893102221 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593575800677 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.