Research can find new medicine and treatment, which are essential to health and disease. Who do you think should fund this research: the private companies, individuals or governments?
From the beginning of life, human is the special specie with unique properties. For thousands of years, people studied about themselves and all of them want to know how to live longer and healthier. They have discovered many aspects to achieve what they need through research about medicine and treatment which are the key points to deal with disease and improve health status. However, either the governments or private companies or individuals should fund for these researches. From my point of view, the investment in health studies should be shared for both authorities and private companies, individuals.
Firstly, government is a more reliable funder with a large financial strength and social effectiveness. The research topics which are controlled by authorities can have much effect to our society. People can access that new developments in drugs and therapies much easier due to the publication from politics are widely used by hospital along the country. Secondly, new studies need enormous amount of investment in money, people and time because many experiments need to be tested and the hard of job is. As a tax collector, government has a wide flow of money and high quality employees which suitable for the academic tasks that need huge resources like research. Last but not least, governments bring the trustworthy from the explorations because they use the resources from their citizens which mean the results they bring out would be more applicable for people. In contrast, private companies and individuals work for maximum profit they can earn. So the tasks from them just less usable for public and high license property and pricy.
On the other hand, private companies and individuals should participate in the chain of produce new medicine. The private ones have the high tech production lines which is the crucial point in manufacturing new products. They have some specialize tools in their fields, which government cannot invest due to its price and application, so the process of bringing out new stocks is more effective. What is more, the marketing of private incorporations is better than the governments done so as to that goods created is extensively known.
On balance, I would argue that although it is not realistic to remove all opportunities for privately funded research, governments should have the main responsibility for the monitoring and controlling of this. The share between them in research and manufacturing will lower the resources that need to be invested.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-10 | Hoang Minh | 73 | view |
- In order to be successful in sport some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The young today spend a large amount of their leisure time in shopping centres. It is feared that this could have a negative influence on the young and society.To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view? 78
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparision where relevant 11
- The monthly price of exported rice from Thailand and Vietnam from 2012 to 2015 Million dollars per tons 77
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ons is better than the governments done so as to that goods created is extensively known...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat goods created is extensively known. On balance, I would argue that although ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, in contrast, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2107.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22828784119 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8544717618 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550868486352 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0675244691 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.894736842 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28365019723 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883670420963 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683187807704 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180787025154 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215626118899 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.