Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison would commit crimes when set free. What are the reasons? What can be done to solve the problem?
Most criminals re-offend after being released from prison. There are several reasons for this, and solutions can be taken to tackle this problem.
On the one hand, prisons serve no purpose other than retaining offenders for a certain time. Prisoners are kept with other criminals and they just learned about what the others have done or the techniques to commit crimes without being caught. As all that they learned were the negatives, when out of prison, they become a worse version of themselves and can even commit more serious crimes, let alone reoffending. Moreover, the way society treats former offenders is also a major factor contributing to their reoffending. On their release, because of their criminal records, they face social exclusion and find it hard to have a job. Therefore, they will resort to crimes as a way of earning a living.
However, there are several ways to solve this problem. Firstly, the government should incorporate rehabilitation into prisons. By doing this, prisoners will be re-educated and re-trained, thus making them become knowledgeable and possess certain useful skills for making a living after their served period. Secondly, the authority should support and keep an eye on them at the same time after they are out in society. Prisoners should be offered jobs and supported to make them become a productive member of society. Also, they should be followed for a certain time to make sure that they would not re-offend.
In conclusion, what criminals learned from prisons and the way society treats them have a major impact on their behaviors. Therefore, solutions with regards to these areas will effectively address the problem of reoffending
- In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Topic: Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- What are the tasks of universities to offer student knowledge and skills essential for their future career or to provide students with access to knowledge itself What do you think university education should contain 33
- In many countries today insufficient respect is shown to older people. What do you think maybe the reasons for this? what problems might this cause to society? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17518248175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65638530062 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580291970803 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.577764738 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.625 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220434506945 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719472492257 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604301365077 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143544482613 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411940069388 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.