Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, base on the altruism and ethical properties, several opulent nations are providing the poorer ones financial assistance. However, it’s believed that financial aid can not solve the issue from the root. Instead of that, I suppose such practical assistances are more preferred in order to help those destitute countries get rid of poverty.
As a matter of fact, we can deny that financial support from the opulent nations provides several benefits to the destitute countries, especially for the resolution of concerning internal issues. Firstly, with the external monetary injections, the governments can handle the consequences of natural or artificial disasters or carry out plenty of purposes, for instance, the improvement of social welfare or infrastructural development. Secondly, financial assistance might help avoid stagnation and foster economic progress. However, that is just a temporary and not a radical solution since the dependence of these countries on that source of money. It’s interpreted as if there is no subsidization from the wealthy, those developing countries can’t solve their own issues.
With regard to sustainable development, the wealthy should provide them some kinds of practical aids instead. Sustainable growth of one country is not merely about finance but also depends on a variety of factors, especially development policies, and education. As experienced countries, they can give the hand to the developing countries through the consultancy about the development orientation and the key economic sectors which they should concentrate on or supply them suitable investigations. Moreover, education plays a vital role in the further development of every country. The prosperous nations can establish some schools or institutes with professional and systematic education and training programs in several fields such as science, technology or medicine and so on to encourage their development. Besides, some exchange programs that send experts and receive the gifted students from the developed countries create great opportunities for those students to approach the achievements of the developed and apply what they have learned to build-up their countries.
In conclusion, financial aid is undeniably beneficial for poorer countries. However, in order to get rid of poverty and develop sustainably, they need more than that, such as some particularly practical assistance from the developed nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | viet@2002 | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | quan12341234 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | cinderel | 61 | view |
- Cambridge IELTS 13 test1 11
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 73
- Many people believe that zoos are cruel others believe that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79338842975 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12395965425 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561983471074 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.179906063 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.4375 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229630053553 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747750931194 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468382632297 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139429488366 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210268542063 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.