Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The poverty problem is not solved simply by giving money to poorer countries by the wealthy ones. Instead of such financial help, the more developed countries should provide other methods of help that could actually make a difference. I completely agree with the above notion because of the reasons mentioned below in this essay.
Firstly, poverty is not a problem which could be solved at once, in fact, it prolongs over time and needs either up-skilling the citizens, educating them, or some solid reforms in the system by the government. Helping such countries using financial means is definitely a wonderful gesture by other countries, however, it does not even remotely help solve poverty. This money is only good to help solve one problem which needs immediate attention, but what happens after the aid is consumed?
Secondly, the answer to the above question is getting back to square one, meaning, the poorer countries would end up in the same place they were before getting the help. In order to help, the developed countries should help them by educating the nation's people or supplying some resources which are scarce in quantity. Another form of help could be creating tourist attractions and propagating them so that the country can generate revenue enabling them to sustain themselves and slowly even eradicate poverty.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate by saying that solving poverty is not a one-time job, rather it needs other reforms such as up-skilling and educating the citizens, creating tourist attractions, etc which helps generate revenue. Therefore, wealthy countries should focus on providing help other than money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case do you think this is a positive or a negative situation 56
- With the increasing population and growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty places What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty How can this be solved 89
- It is commonly believed that nowadays main factors that affect a child s development are media pop culture and friends A different point of view is that family plays the most significant role Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cus on providing help other than money.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5935299808 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6351491865 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.090909091 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359034023465 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155111159965 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101025698867 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23655369903 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646774615896 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.