Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is believed by some organizations that the employees should be dressed well, while others believe the quality of the work done by the employee is of greater importance. In my opinion, the profession determines whether dressing well should be given more importance or the quality of the work.
On one hand, the way an employee is dressed is considered to be a crucial factor in the organization. Being dressed smartly gives the employee confidence in the work and provides a professional look. For example, in the profession of marketing where the employee has to present the product in front of the client or a consumer, being dressed professionally is of the utmost importance. Humans tend to show more trust in the other person when he or she is smartly dressed. Sloppy dressing can lead to the client calling off the deal or not even listening to the presentation.
On the other hand, some organizations prefer the quality of work to hold value rather than the appearance of the employee. For any organization to grow, the work done by the employees is the critical factor rather than the appearance. The consumers or the public do not see how the employers look but see the product of the company and create a mental image of the company.
Finally, in my opinion, it is completely dependent on the profession to decide whether to give higher importance to the quality of the work or the dress code. For example, in the professions such as Law, marketing, etc. it is very important to look smart and professional as they directly have to deal with the judge, clients, consumers, etc. Whereas in the case of an IT company, the software built by the organization is visible to the public and not the employees. In this case, the quality of the product which is directly proportional to the quality of the work done by the employee is of greater importance.
In conclusion, there is not a single correct view on whether to give more importance to work or the dress code. It should be based on the profession rather than generalizing it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case do you think this is a positive or a negative situation 56
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 60
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
... consumers, etc. Whereas in the case of an IT company, the software built by the orga...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...mers, etc. Whereas in the case of an IT company, the software built by the organization...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, look, so, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77528089888 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85998650128 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435393258427 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9411764706 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30461863176 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101117970078 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885539696063 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179793668551 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667233168289 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.