Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the current-developing society, poverty in non-developed coutries might be an sensitive issue and one of the most popular solutions is financial assistance from powerful nations. However, money support might be not an strong solution in long-term period. I strongly agree with the statement and I would like to elaborate on it in details with the below explanation-essay.
On the first place of thinking, money cannot directly help to solve current problems in poor countries if they do not have suitable directions for using. For example, a country is on starvation and the citizens significantly need foods, water in stead of money-recieving; the reason is that these foundations can pull people to get out of difficult days gradually. Moreover, in poor nations, trading might be not developed for utilizing money to purchase consumer goods easily. Hence, financial support can be unreasonable for some special cases of poor countries.
In addition, one of the most essential reasons why strong-financial-nations should not give money for poor country is the risk of increasing social problems. It is the fact that poor nations could have low quality education systems; thus, most of the citizens might not have the opportunities to go to school. In parallel, unemployed and crime rates can be higher than other countries. Providing money for poor countries can be the reason leading to robber issues on these nations. As a result, government has more and more difficulties on managing citizens and economy.
In conclusion, financial support for poor countries is not the best choice; in some cases, it can cause some certain matters towards society. Whereas the other suitable assistances with money can contribute to the improvement for both economy and politism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 78
- With growing population in cities more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollutions and housing problems To what extent do you agree to disagree with this statement 89
- Nowadays it is common for people to get married and have children in their thirties rather than when they are younger Do you agree or disagree that this trend will benefit society 56
- Nowadays a lot of people change the way of smoking from conventional cigarettes to electronic ones Discuss advantages and disadvantages of this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...erty in non-developed coutries might be an sensitive issue and one of the most pop...
^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ns. However, money support might be not an strong solution in long-term period. I ...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
...itizens significantly need foods, water in stead of money-recieving; the reason is that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34163701068 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23793746924 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8755717763 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230632020803 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794250476064 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648343065993 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138129662944 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502821253574 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.