Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects like philosophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment To wh

Essay topics:

Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy, and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Over the past few years, the amount spent on graduation through universities has increased rapidly and tending to rise more gradually. On the other hand, the employment prospects for graduates is significantly decreasing. Therefore, some people thinks that universities should teach practical courses instead of theoretical arts subjects so that there can be maximum opportunities of employment. I tend to disagree with the above statement and in this essay I will discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages for both types of subjects.
Degree Courses like practical, technology are currently in demand. As per today’s job requirement, practical subjects weighs more compared to Art/theoretical subjects. People often study technical courses these days which helps them for their employment with great salary packages.
Whereas, Arts subject lacks the skills required for jobs in the market today. But, subjects like philosophy and history also has same role in the one’s education as some other practical course .For Example, History subject makes us to understand the ancestor’s cultures, Art, values. If these kind of subject will be excluded then future generations might lack their culture, values any other artistic skills and we can expect them to be a robot instead of human.
To Sum up, we need to balance between educational subjects and should not exclude Art subjects as it as plays pivotal role in means of education same as the practical courses. However, as per trending skills in demand universities should try to more inculcate practical subjects along with the theoretical one which will assist students to become proficient and increase their chances of employment.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-03 RkmsU 84 view
2022-11-11 Angina 73 view
2020-09-12 29irfankhan@gmail.com 61 view
2020-03-11 abhishekkanuganti 73 view
2020-02-25 mehjabin 61 view
Essays by user mehjabin :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...tement and in this essay I will discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages for both t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...education as some other practical course .For Example, History subject makes us to...
^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ucation as some other practical course .For Example, History subject makes us to un...
^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...he ancestor’s cultures, Art, values. If these kind of subject will be excluded then future...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...courses. However, as per trending skills in demand universities should try to mor...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, kind of, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.463878327 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90328023603 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2047889482 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335393357085 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11968824857 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065193508021 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197689881664 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557534969166 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.