Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary settings, increasing university fees and low employment prospects for graduates have been major concerns among the public. Thus, there exists a recent belief that universities ought not to involve arts subjects in the curriculum and only teach practical courses that are useful for students' future career paths. Personally, I am in consummate discord with this viewpoint by virtue of benefiting a host of art-inclined individuals and providing a balance in tertiary education.
To begin with, it is irrefutable that arts-based degrees are of paramount importance to a number of arts-majored students. Since those undergraduates have talents in arts subjects, they should have a right to follow a curriculum that can express their strengths. Without subjects like philosophy or history, not only society will be understaffed in these departments in the future, but students whose interests are arts subjects will not be able to fully exploit their potential. For instance, should a student excellent at history be forced to study Maths and the like, his career prospects in the future will be scarce as he is not qualified enough. Instead, this person must have been an eminent historian once he is allowed to pursue subjects he is keen on.
Furthermore, an educational equilibrium will be disturbed if universities completely abandon arts subjects. In addition to science-based degrees, arts-degree support undergraduates with new knowledge from diverse fields. Thanks to the fact that they can witness their lives and issues from different spectacles, their problem-solving skills will be more advanced. As a result, this will indubitably be useful for the holistic development of students. In the future, they will become reliable and are more likely to gain promotions in their workplaces.
In summary, eliminating arts subjects is not a wise idea as it will exert deleterious impacts on many individuals. Therefore, the public should be more open-minded and accept this educational format in order to ensure a sustainable development of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | RkmsU | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | Angina | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | 29irfankhan@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | abhishekkanuganti | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | mehjabin | 61 | view |
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects like philosophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment To wh 84
- People are responsible for their happiness Others feel happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The continued rise in the world s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time What are the causes of this continued rise Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in summary, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.484375 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15589571031 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596875 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4438996373 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244190224051 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780782863924 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677066864712 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144345865682 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09233102434 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.