rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The subjects to be taught in universities, should not be decided merely by looking at university fees and on employment basis but it has to consider the interest of different kind of students willing to take different courses. Also, if the universities stop teaching arts subjects like philosophy and history, it greatly effects one particular field of students. So, I totally disagree with the given statement.
We cannot confine interests of students to only one particular field because each one has his own interests. For example, if a student is interested in history and philosophy and aspires to become a philosopher, then in such case if universities ban these subjects, we are indirectly trying to kill his/her dreams.
We must not bother about the employment opportunities in these fields because we cannot provide employment to each and every person, who wants to work. The one who is more proficient and skilled will be bagging the opportunity. If more of us try to join the practical degree courses without having any interest but simply looking at job opportunities, we need to face difficulties to clear the course and even if we clear it , we cannot easily get the job we desire because more will be the count of people thinking in a similar way and opting practical courses. One example is the lack of employment in the field of B.tech degree in India. The more is the number of degree holders but less became the job opportunity, as the number of people opting for this course became more in number, looking at job opportunities.
On the whole, we cannot simply say that universities have to ban arts subjects looking at fees and employment opportunities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Hanna39 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | aleenapj | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | Sreeveni Das | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | vaishali saral | 78 | view |
- rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To 59
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods.To what extent do you agree? 11
- Nowadays all new town planning should include public parks shopping malls and sports facilities Do you agree or disagree 72
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams,e.g:football.However, some think that it is better to play individual games e.g: swimming, etc.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 87
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world space. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantagesTo what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...clear the course and even if we clear it , we cannot easily get the job we desire ...
^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...re will be the count of people thinking in a similar way and opting practical courses. One examp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, as to, for example, kind of, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9222614841 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90529233757 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52296819788 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2774256852 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.636363636 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205731321037 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802778768954 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652516708977 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141401151399 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478816457804 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.