One of the most debatable points of the 21st century is automating jobs using Artificial intelligence and Robotics. While the majority of experts are of the opinion that it would help employers to get their job done rapidly and get financial benefits, the tiny number of professionals argue that these would enhance the scale of unemployment and the government administration has to deal with it. In this essay, I will discuss both views and state my own position.
First of all, those who support the automation claim that they can get rid of tedious and possibly hazardous jobs. Thus, employee safety would be provided across all of the industries. In addition to that, they affirmed that the processes are also accelerated in terms of production and quality. Therefore, these techniques provide more productivity and gain net profits. In a recent study, it stated that after introducing these automating processes, companies raised their income over 30%.
Meanwhile, the opponents are raising issues over this phenomenon as these programmed stuffed machinery are reducing job opportunities. So, it would cause unemployment mayhem. Till now, the government is not actively involving in this issue as they treat these things are so-called intelligent stuff. But the administration has to take a serious note on this issue because in recent years, unemployment is raising at an alarming rate.
In conclusion, while there are convincing arguments on both sides of the debate, the government has to bring policies to balance between robotic technology and human work. I strongly believe that advancement in technology is inevitable and should not be restricted. However, companies and employers have to maintain harmony between these two.
- You have recently started to work in a new company. Write a letter to an English speaking friend. In your letter, explain•Why you have changed the job•Describe your new job•Tell him/her your other news 75
- Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference. Write a letter to a former teacher. In your letter, give details of the job, explain why it is important to you, suggest that information your teacher could put in the reference. 78
- You have borrowed something from your friend, but it was damaged. Write a letter to your friend and say- Apologize for damaging the product- How was it damaged?- What will you do about it? 56
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...mployee safety would be provided across all of the industries. In addition to that, they a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to maintain harmony between these two.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38686131387 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96108455434 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627737226277 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7525341879 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129051209658 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037901071831 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401519056677 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669869765166 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314716042716 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.