Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In contemporary settings, there are numerous scientific innovations in the Department of Agriculture. Thus, many people believe that those invariably bring about great merits. Personally, I am in consummate accord with this viewpoint for reasons of financial prospects and more job opportunities.

In the first place, it is irrefutable that agricultural advancements are beneficial to the economy. Thanks to the fact that cultivation techniques have been significantly improved, along with the assistance of several chemicals, farmers these days are able to harvest fruitful crops annually. For instance, with the help of a plow and a sufficient amount of pesticide, farmers can quickly exploit the full potential of crops. As a result, the more farms can apply the latest scientific developments to their farming activities, the more massive production is available, thereby even making it possible to export and contribute to the national economy.

More than that, the introduction of scientific advent to agriculture also leads to an increase in the need for labor. Since machines used in farming are becoming more complicated and somewhat difficult to operate, they require a number of qualified agricultural engineers, not only to help guide trivial farmers on how to use them but also to be accessible whenever any technical errors happen. Resultantly, the farming process will be much more efficient; more pertinently, the current rate of unemployment will be tackled.

In conclusion, as profound as scientific improvements in agriculture are, citizens can definitely reap the benefit of those to better their own society. Therefore, it is hopeful that more breakthroughs in this field can appear in the future.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 61 view
Essays by user RkmsU :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18138525193 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7566734961 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131104051273 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044292868349 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268580600148 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079012856541 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228342920847 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.