Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by private companies rather than governments. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, there has been an increasingly popularised opinion that private enterprises should be responsible for conducting scientific research instead of the authorities. Although there can be no doubt that this practice is beneficial to a certain extent, the disadvantages are of greater significance.
On the one hand, proponents of businesses doing scientific research emphasize the fact that severe social issues can be tackled more rapidly. Scientific research, nevertheless, does not require urgent action or directly worsen human well-being and daily lives. If the government squanders its budget on this, there will be no money left for serious problems like climate change and global warming. Additionally, private companies are specialized in the implementation of scientific discovery since they are profit-driven. With financial incentives, relevant employees might be more motivated to do effective research. Conversely, the authorities are not professionals in the scientific sector and thus cannot achieve any breakthrough in this field.
On the other hand, despite the abovementioned virtues of technological programs being developed by private firms, there is an ethical issue related to its adverse societal effects. The primary objective of companies is to achieve sound financial health. Therefore, there are several entrepreneurs who are willing to indulge in dubious scientific research to gain a dominant position in the world market. For instance, in 2022, the senior manager of a pharmaceutical company received a 2-year sentence for getting involved in immoral experiments on pigs to find a cure for the pandemic with the aim of commercializing the treatment. Another point worth considering is that due to this competitive market, private companies typically obtain a monopoly in utilizing the results of their research, making it unknown to the public. By contrast, the sharing of knowledge among the scientific community becomes the norm, helping a myriad of researchers reduce their time spent making technological contributions.
In conclusion, while private enterprises regulating academic studies might exert several advantages, I am more inclined to the view that the drawbacks are more substantial. It is recommended that businesses achieve scientific advances under the supervision of the authorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | Lâm Yên Chi | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | Lâm Yên Chi | 73 | view |
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- As well as making money businesses also have a responsibility towards society To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student In this regard peers have more of an impact than teachers do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84839650146 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29647761988 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618075801749 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8369488213 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282119509682 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851727999151 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400428607451 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161448090519 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759370704965 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.