Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by private companies rather than governments. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
In the modern world, among a number of issues people have to deal with, technology development is one of them. There is a wide belief that private companies should have more responsibilities in carrying out and controlled scientific inventions than authorities. From my personal perspective, In my opinion, the negative effects of this problem outweigh the benefits owing to the following grounds.
On the one hand, the compelling justification for defending that companies should carry out and controlled research because they sometimes respond more rapidly to demand than governments. In detail, people who invest money in these companies are greedy to make the most of any business opportunity. Thus, huge amounts of money become immediately available for these corporations to conduct research which might maximise profits. A good illustration can be found in the fact that the first company to develop a vaccine stands to make a vast fortune, whether governments buy the vaccine or people have to buy it themselves. However, this leads to a drawback is that scientific study of a company is a business secret.
On the other hand, the reason as to why scientific research is conducted and managed by governments should be supported is that result of inventions are shared to public. This extends opportunities for numerous scientists to promote and develop further research. Additionally, government usually run research without profits such as environmental protection, social equals, vaccines for everyone. Take an example, fee of a vaccine of a private company is higher than a government because government focus on their people while a company focus on their income. Therefore, it will be difficult for residents to access to vaccine unless government carry out and control it.
In conclusion, the ongoing argument convinced me that it is logical that the government should have main responsibilities in research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | Lâm Yên Chi | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | Lâm Yên Chi | 73 | view |
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy 80
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 72
- The table shows the export values of various products in 1997 and 2010 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade Iabelled coffee and banana in 1990 and 2004 in five European countries 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38410596026 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10488692111 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556291390728 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3160322766 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369538991067 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119230130357 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851368898993 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211481438427 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064466404778 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.