Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
Arguments have been made over whether governments or private companies should be in charge of scientific research. In my opinion, it would be better if governments take responsibility for this kind of business.
Research carried out under the control of the governments are clearly superior to the ones carried out by private companies in terms of safety. Laws and rules introduced by the authorities to their laboratories would protect scientists and local residents against the risk of incidence. For example, strong safety culture in academic laboratories, which includes safe equipment systems, is an essential element in the daily work of researchers. However, if unfortunate events happened, the governments would be the most powerful force to confront the problems and deal with them. Research on nuclear energy with its potential innovations yet dangerous uncertainties is a case in point, of which the governments have to take responsibility to build adequate safeguards to prevent people from harm.
Scientific research is often conducted for a long time before they yield harmless and valuable outcomes, by which the government is the one who has enough time and money to invest in these long-term studies. Private companies, however, fear that their expenditure would exceed income and eventually take advantage of incomplete, or improper research. A well-known example is putting genetically modified foods to the market before scientists had carefully analysed, which is considered to be an irresponsible decision. Experiment on animals at pharmaceutical companies is also a controversial topic that many claim to be cruel and unnecessary.
In conclusion, scientific research has many requirements and should be carried out only under proper control of governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ketan | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | trongduong96 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | khietquynh2402 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Yui | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Habui | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 605, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'many claims'.
Suggestion: many claims
...nies is also a controversial topic that many claim to be cruel and unnecessary. In co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64814814815 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19936765014 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0916860181 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.083333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302345069736 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110432734173 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10905718585 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210589745868 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668127533413 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.