Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
At present, scientific research across the world is carried out and controlled sometimes by governments, sometimes by private companies. While there are some arguments in favour of scientific research by corporations, I agree with the view that this should be funded and supervised by the state.
The private sector argues that it is willing to undertake scientific research, but there are two significant dangers in this. In terms of the quality and objectivity of the research itself, corporations which carry this out may be tempted to manipulate results in order to maximize profits. There have been numerous scandals as a result of new products being introduced hurriedly after inadequate trials. For example thalidomide, developed by a German drug company, resulted in the birth of thousands of malformed children. From an ethical perspective, leaving research into areas such as genetic engineering in the hands of corporations may have profound social consequences –such as GM crops, with unproven effects which may destroy whole ecosystems as a result of meddling with nature.
Although governments have to allocate resources to many areas of public spending, it is essential that they be responsible for scientific research. Firstly, the highest standards can be set by providing funding for university departments to carry out high-quality research designed to benefit society, not to break into new markets or to gain a competitive edge. Knowledge thus gained can be shared worldwide throughout the academic community. Secondly, government-decision making is the best way to prioritize expenditure on specific areas of research, taking into consideration the needs of society, both present and future. One example is the development of renewable energy to meet growing demands.
In conclusion, I agree strongly with the view that governments should bear sole responsibility for scientific research.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-10 | ketan | 67 | view |
2020-01-07 | trongduong96 | 89 | view |
2019-12-21 | khietquynh2402 | 78 | view |
2019-12-12 | Yui | 89 | view |
2019-12-01 | Habui | 61 | view |
- It is necessary for parents to attend a parenting course to bring their children up. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- People can eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas. As a result, people eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future. 84
- Many people think that countries should import less food and produce more for their population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent to you agree or disagree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'controlled'.
Suggestion: sometimes controlled
...rch across the world is carried out and controlled sometimes by governments, sometimes by private co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62542955326 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19017708584 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6336184132 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303397918579 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104685922516 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843659242805 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208419007487 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855194224546 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.