Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Today, the question of whether the whole world should speak the same language has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although promoting a global language is not without its advantages, its disadvantages need to be considered more.
There are a multitude of manifest advantages when the linguistic homogeneity appears. First, since the global language can facilitate the communication between people, it will allow countries to make their economy flourish/thrive. Singapore can be a great illustration/ a salient example of this situation as it is a country where English is adopted as the official language, paving the way/opening the avenues for foreign investments to penetrate into Singapore’s market thanks to the easy trade and business transaction. Second, by promoting global language, people have the opportunity to gain a wealth of knowledge. It is apparent that they will have a chance to explore all the know- how (knowledge) of humans being in a language, which will help them gain deeper understanding in a wide range of fields such as science, math, and so forth, by extension, carve out more breakthroughs for humans.
Nevertheless, the disadvantages of encouraging people to speak the solely global language are obvious to some extent. First, in order to integrate into the world and to use the global language synchronously, many countries will either give up their native language, or put it in a low priority position. There is ample evidence to suggest that the development of a global language might come at the expense of the native language that has been associated with the customs and practices of a nation over time, directly posing harzard to the prosperity of national culture. Second, if the whole world uses the same language, it is likely that we will lose cultural diversity. For instance, as international media recognises English as its root language, most of the broadcasted information is related to the lifestyle, norms and beliefs of English-speaking countries, and it might put many minority cultures on the verge of extinction, causing people to live in a simple and monotonous world and think and act in similar ways due to the destructive effects of shrinking cultural diversity.
In conclusion, galvanizing people around the globe into using the same language will benefit them in terms of economic development and enriching knowledge, however, they need to consider tremedous effects of abandoning the native language. By taking the language synchronization in a positive way and preserving the native language, people will reap more benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-26 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | hieutrungpham7201 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | miminguyen | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Today, the question of whether the whole world should speak the same l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... they will have a chance to explore all the know- how knowledge of humans being in a lan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 800, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... deeper understanding in a wide range of fields such as science, math, and so for...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dvantages of encouraging people to speak the solely global language are obvious t...
^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... By taking the language synchronization in a positive way and preserving the native language, peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2200.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32687651332 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12125790933 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547215496368 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.5668158133 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.142857143 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175117220578 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611755114561 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368867179224 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110201131758 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270417730835 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.