Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists To what extent do you agree

Essay topics:

Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree?

In contemporary society, seemingly science and technology experts are of more importance than musicians and artists. I do not agree with this view because the two are equally important, for two reasons that there are still a wide range of opera houses, art museums and galleries supported by the government and that arts also are conducive to the society in many ways.
 
Firstly, art and music are everywhere, so do artists and musicians. Although impact of advanced technology is manifested in the modern world, proved by the popularisation of mobile phone and tablets, there are still a sea of artistic and musical works popular in the nowadays society. For instance, in western countries, every weekend there are plentiful people going to the musical halls and opera houses to watch some performance, and according to a survey, the visit rates of world-renowned art museums such as national gallery and the Tate in London are still considerably high. And the government funding for these organisations remain steady and above average.
 
Secondly, art and music are vital and beneficial to the society as a whole. One of the core points is that art and music are in fact created partly for the sake of balancing the negative side-effects of sci-tech. To be more specific, science and technology sometimes can bring scary effects, such as the widespread use of social media, which alienates people in reality, further the distance between people, and even aggravates internet bullying. Whereas by reading more literature, appreciating more artworks and develop apprehension towards music, people could regain humanity and empathy, which makes them more warm-hearted and sympathetic. As a result, the whole world would be a better, more harmonious place to live in, instead of a cold concrete jungle filled with technological products alienating people. There are still plenty of people viewing art as a significant part or even a spiritual pillar of their lives based on these reasons.
 
In conclusion, artists and musicians are being equally valued in today's world, and I believe in the future, people will continue value art and music as they represent humanity, which is the characteristic of humans.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-14 ujjwalsatyam9211@gmail.com 67 view
2021-06-04 vishu vishali 73 view
2020-04-14 YisiFeng 84 view
Essays by user YisiFeng :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conducive to the society in many ways.   Firstly, art and music are everywhere, s...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions remain steady and above average.   Secondly, art and music are vital and be...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of their lives based on these reasons.   In conclusion, artists and musicians are...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20670391061 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87249727554 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578212290503 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6192519113 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.384615385 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5384615385 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211802185785 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748325420707 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750762355438 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132685144869 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498836847261 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conducive to the society in many ways.   Firstly, art and music are everywhere, s...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions remain steady and above average.   Secondly, art and music are vital and be...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of their lives based on these reasons.   In conclusion, artists and musicians are...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20670391061 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87249727554 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578212290503 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6192519113 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.384615385 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5384615385 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211802185785 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748325420707 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750762355438 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132685144869 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498836847261 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.