Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is forecast that computers will replace drivers so that they might no longer drive the car by themselves in the next few years. It is a result of several reasons and in my opinion, this development has both benefits and drawbacks.
To begin with, there is one main reason why self-driving cars will be more popular in the near future. Firstly, since artificial intelligence is more invested and developed by many giant companies such as Google or Microsoft recently, experts can use this latest technological advancement for vehicles. Therefore, cars are no longer driven by people instead of computers. Moreover, the artificial intelligence is able to analyze the potential obstacles on the road better than human due to the poorer visibility than technology, which helps to reduce the possibilities of accidents. As a result, the situation of the self-driving car which is more and more popular is reasonable.
In my perspective, this is a positive change because of one reason. The advantage is that the acquisition of driver licenses might be unnecessary so that people will spend less time and money on practicing or testing to achieve them. However, if any advanced features in these cars do not function properly and people have no skills to drive themselves, the accidents are more likely to occur. Moreover, as these means of transport seem extremely expensive, it is impossible for those who are low-income to afford. Consequently, these vehicles are just only utilized by a small group of people, normally the rich.
In conclusion, people nowadays can apply the advanced technology for driving cars, however personally, the disadvantages will outweigh the benefit.
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 53
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 59
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject. What are causes? And what will be effects on society? 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is more and more popular is reasonable. In my perspective, this is a positive ch...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
... are more likely to occur. Moreover, as these means of transport seem extremely expensive, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...y expensive, it is impossible for those who are low-income to afford. Consequently, the...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll group of people, normally the rich. In conclusion, people nowadays can apply...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23616236162 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99863124233 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9588295821 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.153846154 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166576853865 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572170124776 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520567742617 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856161392172 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384924453719 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.