Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Globalization is an inevitable trend which has influenced many nations in over the world. Language is also an aspect which has been affected by this orientation. Many linguistics believed that people will use an international language in the future. Personally, I strongly agree that this is a positive development of our society, because of some reasons below
Firstly, when utilizing the same language, the world economy will be encouraged to develop. Obviously, this world has been suffered a lot of differences, such as language, power and social structure. These things are the barriers which against the growth of the world industry, education, tourism and global cooperation. If countries use an international language and have the same purpose, the fences will be demolished. Then, the world economy will be liberated to improve. Many advancements will be resulted in this improvement. For one thing, the international corporation - Facebook might be grown and spread into every corner of this world. The profit from this growth will be a critical financial resource of the worldwide economy.
Secondly, a global language delivers the mankind a wider source of knowledge, so every individual, any global citizen can access it. In fact, because of the linguistic differences, many people could not participate to the field which they want to research or intend to undertake. For example, Vietnamese students have to get an IELTS certificate if they want to study in a English spoken country. That is the unequal fact which can be completely tackled when the world have the same language. Even so, the world and indigenous knowledge will be shared to many people. Therefore, every student, scholars, and scientists will have the same channel to learn effectively about the global value.
In conclusion, the same language and linguistic agreement are vital for the world and humanity. They not only improve the global knowledge sharing, but also is a foundation of the world economy's growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | My Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
- Evaluate a public place Suggest how it could be made more appealing It should be 500 words 10 in length 36
- Three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1982, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 61
- Some people believe the benefits of tourism outweigh the problems it creates in particular place Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both view. 56
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is waste of valuable money What is your opinion 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...TS certificate if they want to study in a English spoken country. That is the une...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, even so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28616352201 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92965451229 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544025157233 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2755639756 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4736842105 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7368421053 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158988615046 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554928387547 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551376725294 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914075919798 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506537568238 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.