In this day and age, there is a small number of people speaking minority languages and this practice brings ones to the brink of extinction. Some people believe that more government money is needed to preserve these languages; however, others state that this is extravagant. This essay will consider both views and then I will give my own perspective.
On the one hand, many people argue that authorities should invest money in the protection of minority languages. In particular, language seems to be the soul of ethnic culture because it is a means of communication and exchanging customs and habits among ethnic groups. With each language that dies, people lose a huge cultural legacy as well as the connection of a group of people to the world. For example, each of the 54 ethnic groups in Vietnam has its own language that represents their cultural identity. Moreover, when tourists come to a country, they tend to be attracted by the unique cultural features and are willing to spend money to participate in these cultural experiences. As a result, this significantly contributed to developing the national tourism and economy.
On other hand, others think that making every possible effort to save minority languages is wasteful. Firstly, these languages are less popular than other languages. Therefore, if the state wants to attract more learners to minority languages, they have to pour a huge amount of money into relevant materials, proficient teachers and promotion. In addition, financial ability together with economic situation has adverse effects on language maintenance. Apparently, money should be a priority spent on other public services namely traffic, infrastructure and environment in many poor countries to enrich the quality of citizens' life rather than language conservation.
To conclude, people possess different opinions about whether the government should allocate a budget to language protection or that would be a waste of money. However, I strongly believe that economic status and national budget availability are important factors that should be considered by the government before making decisions about language minority conservation.
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that it would be a waste of money 84
- University education should be free to everyone regardless of income To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- 1 Technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 89
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in sociely such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
In this day and age, there is a small number of people speaking minority languages and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... traffic, infrastructure and environment in many poor countries to enrich the qua...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in particular, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42477876106 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91342104862 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563421828909 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3322916541 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9375 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400578353838 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120319483947 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775771045197 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229599342442 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230316509568 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.