Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, it is true that some languages spoken by small groups of people may disappear and there are two arguments for this problem. While a school of thought holds that these languages should be preserved by national authorities, in my point of view, countries could save a huge amount of money by allowing this extinction to happen.
On the one hand, it is argued that Government should try to preserve minority languages because of the undeniable values that they bring to each country. Commencing with, each language plays an important role in establishing the cultural identity of each country. A language not only is a simple means of communication but also has a vital connection with the whole life of people who speak them since it has evolved over thousands of years along with the appearance and growth of a certain community or a tribe. Therefore, if it goes extinct, the country will lose its cultural diversity which makes societies more interesting and colorful. In addition, a minority language may be greatly helpful in researching valuable things about certain areas which have scientific and educational significance. To be more specific, there are many traditional myths or lessons, such as literature or medical treatment instruction, which were documented in minority languages by ancestors, so if these languages die out, then these values will also be lost.
Despite the above arguments, I assume that investing heavily in retaining minor languages wastes our public funds and results in negligible benefits. Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small group of people, expensive education programs will be necessary to make sure that more people learn it, and the states will have to pay for facilities, teachers, and marketing. In meanwhile, this budget might be better allocated for other more essential public services such as medical facilities, scientific research, and economic development aid fund,… which contribute considerably to the wealth & growth of a nation. Secondly, it would be much more efficient for countries to have just one common language. In other words, instead of spending money and time on obtaining a language that would diminish in the future, it is better for people to excel in another international language, such as English, Germany, French, or Japanese,… so that they can catch up with the rapid speed of globalization.
In conclusion, although minority languages also make certain contributions to cultural diversity, the national budget is limited and should be used for other more important domains.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | hoaithuongnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | Hanabi | 56 | view |
- Consumers are facing an increasing number of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 89
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 89
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...earch, and economic development aid fund,… which contribute considerably to the we...
^^
Line 3, column 933, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...as English, Germany, French, or Japanese,… so that they can catch up with the rapi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27250608273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91887173198 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566909975669 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7230181202 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.785714286 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3571428571 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304824740864 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101171105917 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545016647295 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187092122701 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634146282798 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.