Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such thing as food and educations? Or it is the responsibility of the government of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Some people hold the opinion that well-rich countries need to support poor nations across the world with the help of food and education or poorer country's people should be provided by its own government instead of others. My inclination supports the statement that it is the obligation of every wealthy nation to support more unfortunate countries either by food or money.
This paragraph will discuss about the few positive effects of supporting poorer countries through rich nations that actually is the responsibility of every human being to help each others to uphold the humanity around the globe which could be far beneficial for their future generation. One obvious advantage of helping poor countries is that they can spend their happy life by eating well nutrition alongside quality of education. Many intellectual people are concerned that there are many countries across the world who are not even enough capable to provide batter education and food to their people to survive average life for instance, Syria, South Africa, South Sudan, Liberia and many others.
Furthermore, survey depicts that there are number of third world countries are existing in the world wherein people are dying starve to death on regular basis owing to depletion of fresh water and food that eventually is unfair with them. Along with, their governments has become hopeless notwithstanding they are surviving their lives. On the flip side, first world countries spends ample amount of money on their structure development which falls in luxury items.
All in all, in order to streamline the situation of poorer countries every develop nation should fix their some amount to support unfortunate countries for the sake of their life who also deserve to spend their happy life like others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 61 | view |
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and source of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 78
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problem as a result. Why do many working people not get enough exercise? What can be done about this problem? 73
- Is the internet bad for young people 76
- Some people believe that universities should only offer places to students with high marks while other believes that people of all ages should be allowed even they don t do well in school Discuss both views and give your opinion 77
- The First chart shows the population of England and Wales between 1700 and 2000 The second chart gives information about the birth and death rate in the same countries in the same period 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to spend their happy life like others.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, furthermore, if, so, third, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25174825175 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5393668077 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573426573427 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4375361096 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.888888889 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7777777778 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254539093878 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111397021295 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667133614782 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169020847089 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488228185201 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.