Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today. In the interest of the public health, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products. Do you agree or disagree.
Since early in the present century, the detrimental effects of cigarettes and other tobacco products on health has received considerable attention. There is a widely held view that governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products for the sake of protecting public health. While there still remain some valid arguments to the contrary, it is my personal view that cigarettes and tobacco should be made illegal.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that not only does smoking affect negatively on the person smoking but it also has adverse impact on people surrounding. On individual scale, cigarettes and other tobacco products are high in nicotin and harmful chemical substances that are responsible for countless ailments and even death. Moreover, although I certainly agree that smoking can stimulate good mood and excitement, its cost and negative effects on health in the long run are significant. In other words, while smoking is beneficial in the long term, its long term effect are generally negative. Therefore, laws prohibiting smoking would be entirely justified.
Further and even more importantly, people spend a great deal of money on cigarettes and other tobacco products per anum, which is really harmful to the host economy. It is estimated that it costs about 2 dollars to buy a pack of cigarettes and each adult consume approximately 2 packs every day. What is more is that it is prohibitively expensive to cure smoking- related ailments. It costs national budget millions of dollar yearly. It either costs smokers time and money to heal their illness or interrupt manufacturing because of the lack of healthy labor.
By way of conclusion, I once again affirm my position that government should take the responsibility of controlling the trade and consume of cigarettes and other tobacco products for the sake of the shared benefit of society. In years to come, I believe that public education in terms of danger potential of smoking and laws banning consuming cigarettes and tobacco goods should be warranted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-13 | duxin0101 | 89 | view |
| 2018-02-25 | moewlien | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | ujjwalsatyam 9211 | 91 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | anxiety44 | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | lovepreet000 | 43 | view |
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their life time. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth What are solutions for these problems 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 95
- The Internet has dramati negative, the overall effect of this technology has been positive.What are your opinions on this? 80
- Task 2 It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks Do you agree or disagree with this statement 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, while, first of all, in other words, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22121212121 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85454062922 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4452912677 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.866666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269028237138 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867293727068 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682951584853 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166387876846 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624333420826 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.