Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is asserted by a number of people that leadership skills belong to human instinct whereas critics say that this is the result of progressing and learning. I would concur with the later notion on the grounds that there are some aspects of leadership in which genetic traits are unable to intervene in.
For one thing, the progenies could inherit several characteristics from their parents to become a good leader. When the fetus is in its formative period and the mother is pregnanting, in such conditions, the primitive cognitive system and preconception of the child are nurtured by the nutrients they absorb from the mother. From a scientific perspective, they will subconsciously be affected by both maternal and paternal intelligence and personality. In the context in which parents are leaders, as a result, when they are born, certain traits that have been instilled in their natural instincts will contribute to their further development of individuality. These kids with dynamic characteristics or autonomous and abstract thinking will likely to embark on the same path of being a leader like their parents.
For another, I still hold the view that leadership skills can be acquired through training and learning as these two factors lay a solid foundation of every true achievements. Yet, it is essential to instruct a child and gear him towards leading the others at an early age. Notwithstanding how good their parents are, having the right instruction is of crucial importance when environmental factors also contribute in shaping personality. For instance, kids could be educated at school about how to conduct a small event or festival under the supervision of the adults or to organize club activities and ensure the specific role of each member during the operation. Hence, during the process, it will foster in them the problem-solving abilities which genetic traits cannot be involved. Furthermore, criticism is an inevitable part which leaders will encounter and people have to be mentally stable to overcome such hardship, which could only be learnt from previous failures when training.
To conclude, the view that genetic traits account for good leadership skills could be justified to some degree. Nonetheless, practicing is more important in determining one’s ability to shape the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-04 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | akorn99 | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-26 | sonnn | 95 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 84 | view |
- Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly but most patients do not follow an exercise routine Why do you think this happens How can people be encouraged to exercise regularly 89
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others argue that happiness depends on different factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some countries have introduced laws to limit working hours for employees Why are these laws introduced Do you think they are a positive or negative development 84
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 56
- Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, still, whereas, for instance, as a result, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30894308943 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00987522317 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579945799458 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6340500331 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184028786622 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592743572039 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525275868224 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114748231505 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266568293865 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.